Wednesday, September 2, 2009
nature?????
In my life nature is a source of unbias information which i can recieve through my six senses and interperate to my desire. Yes, nature is open to interperation by individuals. Otherwise it would just be a mindless jumble of information that I would not even detect. As soon as nature has been put into thought in my life, it technically has been interperated to fit my mind function. Also referring to the "appirition" of nature as "unbiassed" is acurate. I recieve said information from a fair and neutral source that is, undeniably, itself. This is important because the simplicity of its neutrality allows me to easily understand nature, resulting in a calming effect. This calming effect is in light of my sense of correct interpretation, or opinion, which no person can rightly dissprove. My interpretation is "dissprove proof" because another person whould just use their opinion to "put me down." This would not make sense because no matter what, no two people can completely agree on what they interperate in the vastness of nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I admire the way you've expanded on this (over the previous version I read), though I am still as confused as I am intrigued. I hope that we can work together to clarify your hostility to Emerson's notion of a 'Universal" sense of Nature (one shared by ALL who perceive it). You may, of course, be right (and Emerson may be wrong). Regardless, I'm anxious to understand your position better.
ReplyDelete